Chivas Trademark Clash

| | Comments (2) |

This legal battle doesn't affect Chivas USA, BTW.

This is the clearest explanation of this complex issue I've yet seen (a Goal.com story earlier this week that appeared translated from Spanish was virtually unintelligible), although the ramifications of this courtroom squabble isn't spelled out in this story either.

But, for what it's worth, here's the story:

MEXICO CITY (AP) -- Owners past and present of Mexican side Chivas Guadalajara are engaged in a legal battle over the rights to use the club's name and trademarks.

An administrative court has ruled in favor of a group of former owners and has asked a federal court to follow its guidelines.

However, current owner Jorge Vergara, who bought the club in 2002 and changed its legal name, has said he retains ownership of the name and trademarks of the Chivas brand.

The complex case is likely to go to a higher court or be resolved in an agreement between the sides.

Former president Francisco Cardenas is arguing that the club's trademark still belongs to Club Deportivo Guadalajara AC. When Vergara bought the club, he changed its name to Club Deportivo Guadalajara SA de CV.

Vergera's lawyer, Leticia Ruiz, said the case brought by some of the former owners amounted to a publicity stunt.

"There will be no real legal ramifications," Ruiz said. "We will continue to use our
trademarks and nobody has the right to ask us to do otherwise."

Major League Soccer spokesman Dan Courtemanche said the case does not apply to Chivas USA.

"Chivas USA has protected its brand in the United States and Canada and is not involved with any of the legal proceedings in Mexico," Courtemanche said.

Glad that's cleared up, then.


2 Comments

Jack said:

Thanks for the first clear explanation of what this case is about, I have been looking for the past week or so. The former owners case just seems to be without merit but I guess only the courts can decide that.

Jack
- Soccer Programmes

DirtyDefender said:

Of course Chivas USA "protected" their brand in the US and Canada by filing for a trademark, and of course they're not involved with any of the legal proceedings in Mexico...

Not yet anyway.

From my understanding of things, they have to get things sorted out in Mexico before they can ask for other countries to honour copyrights.

Leave a comment

About 100 Percent Soccer


Sportswriter Nick Green has written the 100 Percent Soccer column since 2005 for the Daily News, Daily Breeze and other Los Angeles area newspapers. The blog of the same name began in 2007. A native of England, he began writing about soccer in the mid-1980s and in 2000 permanently exchanged a seat in the stands for one in the press box. He lives six miles from Carson's Home Depot Center, home of the Los Angeles Galaxy, Chivas USA and the training headquarters for U.S. Soccer and is married to a long-suffering soccer widow. Join Nick on FaceBook and follow him on Twitter.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Nick Green published on February 17, 2010 3:28 PM.

U.S. to Play Czech Republic May 25 was the previous entry in this blog.

Donovan Named Everton Player of the Month is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

DirtyDefender on Chivas Trademark Clash: Of course Chivas USA "protected" their brand in the US and Canada by f ...

Jack on Chivas Trademark Clash: Thanks for the first clear explanation of what this case is about, I h ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Advertisement

Other blogs

Should Have Called Floyd in Inside USC with Scott Wolf
Spring Ball Preview: Running Backs in Inside UCLA with Jon Gold
Sands optioned; Hawksworth to 60-day DL, Wright added to 40-man. in Inside the Dodgers
County's plastic bag ban upheld in The Sausage Factory
Suddenly, the Lakers seem to have issues in Inside the Lakers