<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Under the Dome</title>
      <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/</link>
      <description>Pasadena politics with your host, Star-News reporter Fred Ortega</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Pasadena getting more expensive for menageries, side shows</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In reviewing city documents while preparing my story on an across-the-board 3 percent tax and fee hike approved by the council Monday, I came across some peculiar categories in Pasadena's fee schedule. While I doubt its been a while since a side show or menagerie came to town, purveyors of such peculiar forms of entertainment should be prepared to loosen their purse strings next time they decide to pitch their tents here in the Crown City:<br /><br /><i>Circus or menagerie tax, per day: $765.07 (up from $742.06)<br />Side show tax, per day: $68.33 (up from $66.27)<br />Boxing and wrestling tax, three month license: $688.53 (up from $667.83)<br />Billiard and pool room tax, per application: $131.47 (up from $127.51)<br />Bingo games: $125.12 (up $121.36)<br />Escort bureau applications: $717.24 (up from $695.68)</i><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#061181</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#061181</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Erdman refutes city manager rumors</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Pasadena spokeswoman Ann Erdman dismissed as rumor a recent <a href="http://thefcblog.com/2008/05/13/new-city-manager-of-pasadena-already-selected/">post</a> on the Foothill Cities blog that suggests the city has already settled on a new city manager.<br /><br />The post, which was apparently triggered by a Foothill Cities reader quoting a "fairly reliable source," stated that a permanent replacement for recently retired City Manager Cynthia Kurtz had been selected last Wednesday, and that the winning candidate was a woman and former Glendale city manager.<br /><br />"The City Council doesn't even meet on Wednesdays," said an incredulous Erdman upon being told about the blog post. "The application process hasn't even concluded yet."<br /><br />Erdman said the city will continue accepting applications for the post, currently being filled by Interim City Manager Bernard Melekian, <strike>for about a week</strike> until this Friday. This <a href="http://www.careersingovernment.com/index.cfm?page=jobView&amp;jobID=16714">posting</a> by Bob Murray &amp; Associates, which the city hired to conduct the city manager search, lists the deadline for applications as April 30.<br /><br />Just out of curiosity I started plumbing my old Glendale contacts to find out if they've had any recent female city managers. It doesn't sound like they've ever had one.<br /><br />Glendale spokesman Ritch Wells said that before current City Manager Jim Starbird -- who formerly headed West Covina City Hall -- the Jewel City was headed by Dave Ramsey, who served as city manager for about seven years. Ramsey was preceded by Jim Rez, another long-serving city manager.<br /><br />"To my knowledge Glendale hasn't had a female city manager," said Wells.<br /><br />He added that if Pasadena's application process is still ongoing, city ordinances would preclude the council from settling on a candidate at this point.<br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#060396</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#060396</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:44:29 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>From My Notes: Additional comments on smoking ban**</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Due to print deadlines, I wasn't able to include too many of the public comments -- or council deliberations -- on the city's proposed anti-smoking ordinance in Tuesday's story.<br /><br />While outnumbered by the anti-smokers, there was a significant number of mostly business owners railing against the proposed ordinance. JJ's Steakhouse proprietor Ralph Viscuso said he calculated that the new rule changes would cost his business about $600,000 in lost patronage from smokers, based on an informal survey he conducted.<br /><br />One of his customers, Keith Park, said he would be one of those lost customers.<br /><br /><i>"I went to an Ivy League school, and after all the information I have been given I have decided to smoke cigars," </i>said Park, a La Canada Flintridge resident, who took a pretty cheap shot at some of the proponents of the new smoking rules by saying that instead of worrying about second-hand smoke they should be more concerned about obesity-related illness. "<i>JJ's Steakhouse will lose my business because of this. I go to the Ritz-Carlton Hotel patio to enjoy cigars, and now that place is going to lose my business too."</i><br /><br />One woman said the ordinance would be the beginning of a slippery slope that would lead to the erosion of civil liberties.<br /><br />"<i>I don't want the government to protect me from every perceived hazard," </i>she said. "<i>Please protect our personal freedoms."<br /><br /></i>Don Engle said that the city has a chance to choose between a feel-good law and doing what is right.<br /><br /><i>"Smoking is not illegal," </i>said Engle, who made the seemingly ludicrous suggestion that the stress-relieving benefits from smoking are being ignored, while the proven medical detriments of tobacco are being played up. <i>"If you want to do something good, then close the fast-food restaurants."<br /><br /></i>But the scores of comments from students, community activists and health organization representatives in favor of the new rules seemed to sway the council.<br /><br />Councilman Chris Holden flirted briefly with making the portion of the ordinance prohibiting smoking in outdoor dining areas part of a voluntary program. But Councilman Victor Gordo disagreed.<br /><br />"<i>I don't think this is an issue that lends itself to voluntary compliance measures," </i>Gordo said.&nbsp; <i>"Those who wish to provide a place to smoke (for patrons) have the burden to show they can do so in a manner that isn't going to invade into the space of others... There has been a lot of talk about individual rights tonight, but there is a second part to individual rights, and that is that they end when they begin to infringe upon the rights of others. When somebody is smoking and the smoke travels into somebody else's face.... I believe the smoker's rights end then and there."<br /><br /></i>Councilwoman Margaret McAustin noted that because the enforcement of the new law would be based on complaints to a city phone number, enforcement would be "virtually voluntary" anyways.<br /><br />The city's tobacco control coordinator, Statice Wilmore, said that the city would take several months after enactment of the law to conduct a public education campaign about the new rules through letters, signage and other measures before actively enforcing the law.<br /><br />

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"> Wilmore said that during the public education campaign, "<i>If a complaint is observed, the public can
call the number. Once received it is investigated within one business
day, and if a violation is determined to
have taken place, (the business) will receive a letter from our office. What we really want to do is not go out
punitively, we want to let the public and businesses know about the
new law.</i>"</p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">But she admitted that once enforcement is in full effect, a police officer or other city official with enforcement powers will be able to issue citations "on the spot" if they see a violation taking place.</p><br />In the end the council voted unanimously to proceed with the new regulations -- with the exception of Steve Madison, who was absent from the meeting, **and Holden, who abstained**. They also asked for staffers to come back within one year with an analysis of the new law and its impacts on businesses and the community, as well as suggestions to further extend the ordinance in order to receive an A-rating from the American Lung Association.<br /><br />Among the suggestions on how to achieve that rating, made by various council members including Jacque Robinson and Sid Tyler: outlawing smoking on sidewalks in high-traffic areas of the city; at Brookside Golf Course, the last public open space in the city where smoking is still allowed; and even to require owners multi-family apartments and condominium buildings to reserve a certain percentage of units for non-smokers.<br /><br />**Updated&nbsp;
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#058488</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#058488</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 21:05:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>State looks at Council&apos;s TofR freebies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Former Star-News star reporter Gary Scott points us in his <a href="http://reporter-g.blogspot.com/2008/04/whats-value-of-gift-of-no-value-members.html#links">blog</a> to the <a href="http://www.fppc.ca.gov/pdf/501c3InputNotice.pdf">California Fair Political Practices Commission</a>, which has set its eyes on the free Rose Parade and Rose Bowl tickets Pasadena City Council members get each year.<div><br /></div><div>Turns out that so far the FPPC, the state's political ethics watchdog, has been treating the tickets council members dole out to friends and supporters as having "no value." That is because they are technically "tickets to a nonprofit or political fundraiser."</div><div><br /></div><div>Apparently the FPPC is now considering treating such tickets at "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">face value of the ticket&nbsp;</span></span></span></div>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">less any amount of the ticket price that is indicated as a donation to the nonprofit or, in the&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">alternative, the fair market value of any food, beverage, and entertainment provided to the&nbsp;</span></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">individual</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">."</span></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><br /></span></span></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">So what does that really mean for Council members? According to the <a href="http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:q1QsJSCRGfAJ:www.fppc.ca.gov/agendas/04-08/18946.4memo.pdf+Rose+Parade+tickets,+Pasadena+City+Council&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=4&amp;gl=us">FPPC's own investigation</a> when they last examined this issue in 2004, Mayor Bill Bogaard gets about 150 to 230 Rose Parade grandstand tickets from the Tournament of Roses each year, while individual council members get about 120 a piece.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.sharpseating.com/rose_parade_FAQs.htm">Sharp Seating</a>, the Rose Parade's official grandstand seating provider, is currently selling tickets for anywhere between $42 and $85 a seat. So at the state's current gift limit of $390 for elected officials, even at the lower end of the pricing range an FPPC rule change would end up cutting the mayor and council's maximum allotment to a measly nine tickets each.</span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;"><br /></span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;">The Rose Bowl tix are, of course, a totally different story. According to the FPPC, the 2005 face value price for a ticket to the big game was $125, which would reduce the four free tickets council members were receiving at that time to three if the state's gift limit were applied. But who the heck gets Rose Bowl tickets at face value?&nbsp;<a href="http://www.stubhub.com/rose-bowl-tickets/">Stubhub.com</a> is already selling tickets to next year's game -- at a range of between $299 and $599. &nbsp;That means that if the FPPC changes the rules, Council members would get no more than one freebie -- and it better not be on the 50-yard line.</span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;"><br /></span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;">Furthermore they would have to report nearly all the tickets on their yearly economic interest forms (Form 700), because state law requires any gift valued over $50 to be listed.&nbsp;</span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;"><br /></span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;">Suffice it to say that, if the rules change, there are gonna be a whole lot of council friends/family/contributors watching America's favorite parade and game with the rest of us.... on TV, unless they want to camp out overnight on Colorado for a good seat.</span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;"><br /></span></font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy;">FPPC is requesting public comment on the issue<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';">&nbsp;</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">at</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"> </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">blenkeit@fppc.ca.gov. or &nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span></font></p>
<p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">by telephone at (916) 327-2020</span>.&nbsp;</font></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><br /></p><p style="margin: 0px; font-family: Times New Roman; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><br /></p><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057984</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057984</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:24:11 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>From My Notes: City leapfrogs state in closing liquor store</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Before Victor Gordo made like Elliott Ness shutting down a speakeasy on Saturday, the District 5 councilman told me the city's approach to shutting down the liquor store at El Molino Avenue and Washington Boulevard was necessary because of the nature of the state's liquor licensing process.<br /><br />The liquor store -- site of assaults, drug dealing and even the murder of a former owner during a botched robbery in the early 1990s -- had long been a blight on the neighborhood around Washington Park.<br /><br />Turns out that in the mid-1980s, the state allowed cities to regulate liquor license holders by issuing conditional use permits.<br /><br />

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">According to Gordo, those permits allowed the city to <i>"impose
conditions (lighting, security, no malt liquor, no fortified wines
sold single and cold, etc.). Once that started we had more local
control, because if anyone violated any of those conditions you can
pull their CUP and they can no longer operate, notwithstanding that they have
their original (state liquor) license."</i><br /></p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Unfortunately for municipalities, any liquor license issued before the changes in the mid-'80s was grandfathered in. And that included the license of the liquor store across from Washington Park.<br /></p><br />

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Gordo, from my notes again:</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>"Those are the ones that are
grandfathered in, have no CUPs and therefore no conditions. There is
nothing for us to pull, so enforcement is left in the hands of state, and the state ABC has
about 4 officers for all of L.A. County.</i></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i><br /></i>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>"We have in the neighborhood of 65
licensed establishments in Pasadena, most of which are grandfathered
in so we have no control over them, only the state does. The ones with CUPs
operate very efficiently because they know the city can pull their CUP."</i><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Some of the grandfathered ones? Not so much, Gordo said.<br /></p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Hence the need for the city to come up with a way to convince owners of problem properties with these uncontrolled -- and lucrative -- grandfathered liquor licenses to give them up. And hence the arrangement by which the city helped developer Joel Bryant finance the roughly $1 million purchase of the liquor store&nbsp; -- including the $100,000 to $200,000 liquor license -- to give him enough incentive to just throw away that liquor license and turn the land into an affordable housing site.</p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">

</p>

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">"<i>Until we can get Sacramento to let local
government control these establishments, we have to find other ways" </i>to deal with such nuisance properties, Gordo said<i>. "We should encourage developers and
responsible property owners to purchase these properties from bad operators with
our assistance.</i>"</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p>

<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057314</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057314</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:34:10 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Proposed toll road&apos;s path runs through Pasadena</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Metro has been talking about converting some of the Southland's carpool lanes into toll roads for a while, but the proposal has just been moved $214 million closer to reality thanks to an offer from the feds.<br /><br />The Metro Board voted Thursday to accept the money from the Department of Transportation in a bid to convert carpool lanes along portions of the 210 and 10 freeways into toll lanes. And one stretch would start right here in Pasadena -- at the 710/210/134 junction.<br /><br />The plan still needs to be approved by the state Legislature and the California Transportation Commission. But if it makes it through that gauntlet, drivers could be paying to use the carpool lanes through Pasadena (and all the way out to Glendora) as soon as 2010, according to a Metro spokesman.<br /><br />The L.A. Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-congestion24apr24,0,4120857.story">reports</a> that L.A. got the money when a similar so-called "congestion pricing" plan floated by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg failed to pass muster in the Empire State's Legislature.<br /><br />It is unclear how tolls would be assessed, and whether drivers with a certain amount of passengers (say three or more) would either get to use the tollways for free or at a discounted rate. But Metro spokesman David Sotero says it is likely that solo drivers will be able to use the lanes for a "premium" price, and that fees will likely vary based on the time of day. For example, drivers using the tollways during rush hour would pay much more than if they were tooling down the 210 at midnight on a Saturday.<br /><br />That sounds awfully like the system in place in Orange County along the 91 Express Lanes. Drivers there can pay as much as $9.50 to use the toll road during rush hour, with the price dropping to $1.20 on weekends. Tollway users sign up for accounts with the OCTA and are given a radio transponder that is placed in their vehicles. The device then records the time of day the vehicle entered the tollway, and the appropriate charge is then assessed to the user's account.<br /><br />OCTA allows vehicles with three or more occupants to use a free special lane in the toll road, but it is not always gratis. Three-person vehicles are still assessed a half-price toll during peak times on the eastbound lanes, but the high-occupancy lane on the westbound side is always free.<br /><br />To get a feel for how any future tollways could work, check out OCTA's <a href="http://www.91expresslanes.com/tollschedules.asp">fee schedule</a> and <a href="http://www.91expresslanes.com/generalinfo/commonquestions.asp">frequently asked questions</a>.<br /><br />I doubt this is going to go over well with local drivers. Heck, we called them "free"ways for a reason, right? Mayor Manny Lozano of Baldwin Park is already crying bloody murder over the proposal, and I don't think he'll be the last. But Metro officials say something needs to be done to try to free up the carpool lanes, which at times move as slowly as the rest of the freeway. Plus the money raised by tolls would (theoretically) be used to invest in mass transit projects like the Gold Line extension, which would further reduce congestion on the roadways.<br /><br />What does everybody think? Are you ready to kiss free rides on the carpool lanes goodbye? And do you think it will help traffic -- or will single drivers looking to escape the other lanes no matter the cost end up clogging the HOV lanes even more? Furthermore, with the San Gabriel Valley's track record of getting the shaft when it comes to county-wide transportation funding, do you think the money raised from the tollways will really end up benefiting local projects? Given that the SGV is the guinea pig for Metro's initial toll road experiment, shouldn't that be the case?<br /><br />Also, look out for a half-cent county sales tax hike on the November ballot. Metro is trying to get that one approved by the Board of Supervisors. In their announcement of the sales tax measure, Metro officials specifically named the Gold Line Foothill Extension and the 710 freeway (tunnel) gap closure as two of the projects that could benefit should the tax hike be approved by the voters.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057152</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057152</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:55:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Proposed toll road&apos;s path runs through Pasadena</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Metro has been talking about converting some of the Southland's carpool lanes into toll roads for a while, but the proposal has just been moved $214 million closer to reality thanks to an offer from the feds.<br /><br />The Metro Board voted Thursday to accept the money from the Department of Transportation in a bid to convert carpool lanes along portions of the 210 and 10 freeways into toll lanes. And one stretch would start right here in Pasadena -- at the 710/210/134 junction.<br /><br />The plan still needs to be approved by the state Legislature and the California Transportation Commission. But if it makes it through that gauntlet, drivers could be paying to use the carpool lanes through Pasadena (and all the way out to Glendora) as soon as 2010, according to a Metro spokesman.<br /><br />The L.A. Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-congestion24apr24,0,4120857.story">reports</a> that L.A. got the money when a similar so-called "congestion pricing" plan floated by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg failed to pass muster in the Empire State's Legislature.<br /><br />It is unclear how tolls would be assessed, and whether drivers with a certain amount of passengers (say three or more) would either get to use the tollways for free or at a discounted rate. But Metro spokesman David Sotero says it is likely that solo drivers will be able to use the lanes for a "premium" price, and that fees will likely vary based on the time of day. For example, drivers using the tollways during rush hour would pay much more than if they were tooling down the 210 at midnight on a Saturday.<br /><br />That sounds awfully like the system in place in Orange County along the 91 Express Lanes. Drivers there can pay as much as $9.50 to use the toll road during rush hour, with the price dropping to $1.20 on weekends. Tollway users sign up for accounts with the OCTA and are given a radio transponder that is placed in their vehicles. The device then records the time of day the vehicle entered the tollway, and the appropriate charge is then assessed to the user's account.<br /><br />OCTA allows vehicles with three or more occupants to use a free special lane in the toll road, but it is not always gratis. Three-person vehicles are still assessed a half-price toll during peak times on the eastbound lanes, but the high-occupancy lane on the westbound side is always free.<br /><br />To get a feel for how any future tollways could work, check out OCTA's <a href="http://www.91expresslanes.com/tollschedules.asp">fee schedule</a> and <a href="http://www.91expresslanes.com/generalinfo/commonquestions.asp">frequently asked questions</a>.<br /><br />I doubt this is going to go over well with local drivers. Heck, we called them "free"ways for a reason, right? Mayor Manny Lozano of Baldwin Park is already crying bloody murder over the proposal, and I don't think he'll be the last. But Metro officials say something needs to be done to try to free up the carpool lanes, which at times move as slowly as the rest of the freeway. Plus the money raised by tolls would (theoretically) be used to invest in mass transit projects like the Gold Line extension, which would further reduce congestion on the roadways.<br /><br />What does everybody think? Are you ready to kiss free rides on the carpool lanes goodbye? And do you think it will help traffic -- or will single drivers looking to escape the other lanes no matter the cost end up clogging the HOV lanes even more? Furthermore, with the San Gabriel Valley's track record of getting the shaft when it comes to county-wide transportation funding, do you think the money raised from the tollways will really end up benefiting local projects? Given that the SGV is the guinea pig for Metro's initial toll road experiment, shouldn't that be the case?<br /><br />Also, look out for a half-cent county sales tax hike on the November ballot. Metro is trying to get that one approved by the Board of Supervisors. In their announcement of the sales tax measure, Metro officials specifically named the Gold Line Foothill Extension and the 710 freeway (tunnel) gap closure as two of the projects that could benefit should the tax hike be approved by the voters.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057151</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057151</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:55:18 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Prop. 98: Bane of eminent domain, or rent control-killer?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Probably a little bit of both. The AARP, League of Women Voters and other advocacy groups held a rally Wednesday against Prop. 98, which will be on the ballot on June 3. They claim the proposition, which is being championed by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and various landlord groups, uses concerns about eminent domain as camouflage to hide the fact that the measure would eliminate rent control for about a million Californians.<br /><br />I talked to Howard Jarvis Executive Director Kris Vosburgh, who did not deny the proposition would target rent control practices. But he added that the approach would be a phased one, with rent control being eliminated as tenants moved out on their own.<br /><br />"Yeah you are going to lose rent control
over time but you personally are not going to lose it, Vosburgh said. "It is much
less ominous than the campaign people are making it out to be. They are
really trying to scare people into thinking they are under imminent
threat."<br /><br />Vosburgh said the real people behind the  opposition to Prop. 98 are cities and big developers, who want to keep their eminent domain powers intact. Indeed, the Pasadena City Council has unanimously approved a resolution against Prop. 98 and in favor of a rival measure, Prop. 99.<br /><br />Vosburgh said Prop. 98 would still allow cities to condemn property for public projects like schools and roads, but would prohibit government to take land away from homeowners and turn it over to private developers for the sole purpose of expanding the city's tax base.<br /><br />But the end of rent control, even if it is through a slow, phased death, would still be an injustice to folks on fixed incomes, opponents argued. AARP Executive Council member Martin Schachter said seniors depend on rent-controlled mobile homes and apartments -- and those needs are not going away over time. The phased approach will only lead to a dwindling of rent-controlled properties just as the senior population begins to balloon in the coming years.<br /><br />If it were to pass, Prop. 98 would only give landlords more incentive to kick out rent controlled tenants, said Janelle Longwell, a Los Angeles resident.<br /><br />"I live in a small apartment protected by rent control," said Longwell at the AARP rally, adding she has suffered from epilepsy all of her life. "Rent control allows me to live close to my daughter and best friend in the event of an emergency. But a lot of these landlords are heartless and would stop at nothing to evict renters like me. We are barely getting by with what little we have."<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057000</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#057000</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>City to non-profits: You better have money to get money</title>
         <description><![CDATA[El Centro de Accion Social launched a public comment assault on the City Council Monday, bringing in 10 supporters to ask the council to disregard a Human Services Commission recommendation to cut more than $60,000 in funding from the group, including its total $49,000 request for after-school youth education programs at Muir High and Jefferson Middle School.<br /><br />Mayor Bill Bogaard preemptively halted the assault, allowing three to speak but moving the rest to the end of the meeting, while Councilman Chris Holden suggested the rest of the speakers come back in May when the council makes a final decision on the commission's recommendations, instead of waiting till the end of Monday's meeting.<br /><br />Below is the official scoring sheet the city is using in order to
determine which social service groups get funding through the federal
Community Development Block Grant program. It is a great document for big government critics interested in finding out how the city is squandering taxpayer funds on useless social programs like, say, helping poor kids get to college, or providing health workshops for low-income seniors: <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-file"><a href="http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/CDBG%20Prelim%20Funding%20Recs%20March%202008.pdf">CDBG Prelim Funding Recs March 2008.pdf</a></span><br /><br />Note the "did not demonstrate sufficient leveraging" critique that accompanies many of the lower-scoring applicants. That is a major criteria for cities determining which social service groups get the federal funds they administer, and it means that, in essence, an agency has to have secured enough funding through other sources to sustain a program. Basically these CDBG funds can only be used to supplement or augment existing programs, not support an entire program from scratch.<br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#054000</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#054000</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:39:40 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>How to prevent quakes: Appease the Mother</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I just got the greatest comment I have ever received on a story.<br /><br />The caller was referring to yesterday's <a href="http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/ci_8926858">piece about a new USGS study</a> predicting with "near certainty" that there will be a major, Northridge-sized or larger quake in California in the next 30 years, with the odds of such an even occurring in Southern California more likely than anywhere else in the state.<br /><br />He called himself a "line keeper" and said he worked with spirits to maintain Mother Earth's balance. He criticized the media for giving the seismic study such prominent coverage, and argued that by doing so we are ensuring that such an event will happen. And he had an interesting suggestion on how to counteract the negative energy being radiated by the scientists and the media:<br /><br />

<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">"The Mother wants all her children gathering at
the Rose Bowl, like an international children's gathering with different colors,
different cultures, all dancing,
singing, having a good time," said the caller, who identified himself only as Joe. "We could have little Mayan dances, maybe some kids
playing piano from Germany, whatever the kid's talent they could bring it to the Rose Bowl.
That keeps the Mother happy so she doesn't shake things down."</p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p>
<br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053788</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053788</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Social services group cries foul over proposed cuts</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the West Pasadena Residents' Association won't be the only group lobbying for a change in city policy at tonight's council meeting.</p><p>
While the WPRA is <a href="http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/2008/04/pasadenans_not_happy_about_pro.html">urging residents to show up en masse</a> to protest city staff's suggestion to increase speed limits on nine Pasadena streets, El Centro de Accion Social is also trying to fire up the community about proposed cuts in the amount of money the group receives from the city through the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.</p><p>In an e-mail sent to supporters and the media, El Centro Executive Director Randy Jurado Ertll took exception to a Human Services Commission recommendation to cut funding to the group's youth education programs at Muir High School and Jefferson Elementary School. From the e-mail:</p><p><i>
We would like to simply know why? What was the assesment/criteria used in making this decision?<br />
are youth programs a priority? El Centro helps many students who are English-language learners and who are recent immigrants.</i><br /></p><p>Jurado Ertll urged the community to speak out against the cuts when the council takes up the matter at tonight's meeting. Doors open to the public at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall Council Chambers.<br /></p><p><br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053706</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053706</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pasadenans not happy about proposed speed limit increases</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sounds like the city is planning on increasing the speed limit by about 5 mph on 10 different streets in Pasadena, and that prospect has got some residents as riled up as a bunch of Linda Vistans with a park about to open up next door.<div><br /></div><div>Here's the city's synopsis of staff's proposal, going up before the council at Monday night's meeting:</div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; ">* <b><u><span style="font-weight: bold; ">Speed Limits</span></u></b> – State regulations that define the method for determining speed limits has changed.  As a result, new engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted on 50 street segments in Pasadena to determine whether the process by which existing speed limits were set meet state regulations.  The city council will consider approving proposed speed limit increases on Columbia between Orange and Fair Oaks (30 mph to 35), Glenarm between Pasadena Avenue and Arroyo Parkway (25 to 30), Hill Avenue between the northern city limit and Washington (30 to 35), Mountain Street between Hill Avenue and Altadena Drive (30 to 35), Pasadena Avenue between Walnut and California (35 to 40), Pasadena Avenue between California and the southern city limit (30 to 40), Riviera Drive between Sierra Madre Boulevard and Alegria Street (25 to 30), Villa between Altadena Drive and Eaton Drive (25 to 30), and Washington Boulevard east of Del Rey Avenue to Sierra Madre Boulevard (35 to 40); and will consider approving a proposed speed limit decrease on West Drive between Washington and Seco (40 to 35).</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px; ">Well at least we won't hear any complaints coming from West Drive.</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px;">Interestingly enough, South Pasadena went through the exact same rigamarole last week, with staff <a href="http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/rds_search/ci_8899451">recommending speed limit increases</a> on a bunch of streets and residents crying foul over the whole issue. Apparently the "new state regulations defining methods for determining speed limits" are meant to avoid cities creating speed traps by posting lower limits on streets where the average vehicle speed is regularly higher.</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px;">But that logic does not jibe with the folks at the West Pasadena Residents Association, who put out a special e-mail over the weekend urging people to show up at Monday night's 6:30 p.m. meeting and tell the council to reject the limit increases. The association's argument is much the same as the one used in South Pasadena: If drivers are already exceeding the posted speed limit, increasing it will only prompt even faster driving.</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px;">From the association's e-mail:</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; "><span><i>Staff’s answer to drivers who break the speed limit is to raise the speed limit!</i><span> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">How much sense does that make? The WPRA strongly disagrees with this approach for safety and quality of life reasons.</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; "><span>Instead, the association is asking the city to control speeds by using "traffic calming methods and neighborhood protection tools, so that when it is time to measure the speeds for state requirements, the average speeds will match the posted speeds."</span></p><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; ">That was pretty much the recommendation of the city's Traffic Advisory Commission. Vince Farhat, the TAC's chair, forwarded me a copy of the letter the commission sent to the council urging it to reject staff's speed limit increase recommendations and instead adopt "traffic calming and safety measures" to keep speeds at the currently posted limits. </p><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; ">"In effect, the revised speed limit proposal has yielded a list of nine street segments in Pasadena warranting the immediate implementation of traffic calming measures," the letter read.</p><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; ">We'll see if the council is swayed by the likely strong public showing against the speed limit increases on Monday night -- or the recommendations of its own advisory committee.</p><p style="margin-top: 12pt; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; text-align: justify; "><br /></p></span></span></span></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053522</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053522</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:05:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>From My Notes: Not everybody against Linda Vista Park</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<b>Most reporters find themselves jotting down way more than they can possibly use in a 15-20 inch story. So lets try this: whenever possible, I will post excerpts from my notes that, for whatever reason, never made it into print. Guess that is what a reporter's blog is all about, and it is probably what I (and plenty of other blogging reporters) have been doing to supplement their rants all along. But hey, I like the name. And this way you'll know off the bat that I am giving you additional information collected during the course of reporting a story, and not just making random observations. Actual excerpts are <i>italicized</i>.<br /><br /></b>While it was easy to find folks around the defunct Linda Vista School to complain about the <a href="http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/ci_8872113">community park planned</a> at the back of the school property (at least four members of different households along Linda Vista that I spoke with either had a problem with the park or outright hated the idea), that is not to say everybody in the neighborhood is loathe to have more open space within walking distance. From my notes, here is what Sharon Yonishiro, past president of the Linda Vista Annandale Association, had to tell me about the school district's decision to let the city use the property as a park (at least until August of next year):<br /><br />



<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>This is something the association has
been asking for since the school district made the decision not to
reopen the school. There have been two or three meetings
with the neighborhood sponsored by the city, and it is something we hope
one day will be bigger, but these things take time and we consider
this an important first step.</i></p>
<br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">The two or three meetings are much more than what some of the other neighbors told me. Most of the opponents said they weren't aware of any meetings or planning for the park until either hearing of or receiving the invitation to the grand opening sent by the city in recent days. But most also admitted they worked full time or spent a lot of time away from home, and could have missed any announcements/invitations to meetings.</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br />
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>25 years ago it used to be that the same
area that is being opened up on Saturday was accessible to the
neighborhood (as open space), people got to run their dogs there, etc. But
then the school district decided to make the school bigger, brought
in bungalows which took up part of the area and they needed the rest
of that area for students. So this is a big, important day.</i></p>
<br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Yonishiro then went on to acknowledge some of the concerns of neighbors about increased the increased traffic, loitering, vandalism, parking woes and other headaches a park might bring to the upscale neighborhood.</p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br />
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i>....some might have opposing views in the
area, but it is not like a park with a big frontage on a main drag. These are issues you can't blame someone for raising. But hopefully
it will mostly be a place of quiet contemplation, and possibly some
dog training.</i><br /></p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">And while the following is NOT from my notes, it is from an e-mail I received from reader Betsy Nathane:</p><br /><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i><font face="Lucida Grande, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 12px;">The
new Linda Vista Park will be an asset to the community. The idea of
turning the vacant school property into a PUSD and City joint-use park
has been in the works for the last two years. During this planning
time, there have been all <b>-</b>inclusive neighborhood meetings
first at the library, then as the crowds grew the meetings were moved
to the fire station, and finally two meeting were held<b> </b>at the Rose Bowl press boxes. Councilman<b> </b>Steve
Madison sponsored these meetings with announcements being sent to all
Linda Vista residents. Since the park will be one of the PUSD and City
joint use parks, there will be park police security checking the
grounds twice daily. The park will be open at dawn and closed at dusk. <br />
<br />
The Linda Vista Park is not a destination park. It is a small
neighborhood park which most visitors will reach by walking. The gate
entrance on Linda Vista has been in use for decades and is the only
entrance to the park and it allows for wheelchair accessibility. This
park was designed to be a gathering place enjoyed by all and the
majority of residents are excited about having a neighborhood park. <br /></span></font></i></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><br /><i><font face="Lucida Grande, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 12px;"></span></font></i></p><p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i><font face="Lucida Grande, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><br /><font color="#888888">
</font></span></font></i></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><i><br /></i>
</p>
<br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053254</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053254</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:01:30 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Melekian calls withdrawal from CM search &apos;difficult decision&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Interim City Manager Barney Melekian called his decision to withdraw his name from the list of candidates for the permanent position a "very difficult" one in a phone interview today.<br /><br />But he denied that concerns about a long and arduous selection process had anything to do with his choice, blaming it instead on his impending duties as president of the California Police Officers Association.<br /><br />"I am scheduled to be sworn in as the next president here in Pasadena in March," said Melekian, who currently serves as the group's first vice president. "I sincerely wish this opportunity (for city manager) had come along a year later."<br /><br />Melekian said he made his decision to take his name out of the permanent city manager hat several weeks ago but took his time evaluating his choice before announcing it to the council on Monday night. <br /><br />He added that while the Police Chiefs Association presidency would take up a bit more of his time, he did not plan on leaving the chief's post anytime soon. In fact, serving as an active police chief is a requirement for the position.<br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053068</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#053068</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>City officially announces Melekian dropping out of CM race</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As reported earlier by our Public Editor Larry Wilson, Interim City Manager Barney Melekian has removed his name from the list of candidates vying for the permanent city manager position.</p><p>Ann Erdman confirmed that Melekian, who still retains his title as the city's police chief, made the announcement during an Executive Committee meeting held on Tuesday morning. An official announcement was being embargoed until tomorrow, but was released to the Star-News early after the news broke on the paper's Web site. Following is the text of that announcement:</p><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"></span></p><p><font><span style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Interim Pasadena City Manager Bernard K. Melekian advised the City Council on April 7 that he will not apply for the position of city manager.</span></span></span></font></p><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Melekian is slated to begin serving as president of the California Police Chiefs Association in March 2009.</span></span></p><p><font><span style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">“The decision not to apply was incredibly difficult,” he said.&nbsp; “The primary reason for not applying is a deep desire, both personal and professional, to accept the honor and responsibility of being the president of the California Police Chiefs Association. &nbsp;Additionally, I believe that making a public statement at this point in the search process will ensure the broadest possible pool of candidates.”</span></span></span></font></p><p><font><span style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">The presidency will cap a career of public service in the field of law enforcement that has spanned more than 35 years.</span></span></span></font></p><p><font><span style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">He will continue to serve as interim city manager until the council has selected a new city manager.&nbsp;</span></span></span></font></p><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px; font-style: italic;"><br /></span></p><p></p>

<p>Vicino said Melekian would return to his duties as police chief once a permanent city manager was found, <strike>but it is unclear how long he would remain as police chief before taking the job at the California Police Chiefs Association</strike> (the association presidency is not a full-time position).</p><p>Melekian did not have previous city management experience when he stepped in in January to temporarily replace retiring City Manager Cynthia Kurtz, but was attending USC to receive his doctorate degree in public policy and was favored by many to permanently take over as city manager. He was being paid a $230,000 salary as interim city manager, while his deputy Chris Vicino handled the day-to-day running of the police department.</p><p>The city is currently involved in a nationwide search for a permanent city manager. The executive headhunting firm Bob Murray &amp; Associates is slated to bring the council a list of candidates by early summer.</p><p><br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#052986</link>
         <guid>http://www.insidesocal.com/pasadenapolitics/#052986</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:50:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
