Little still has a lot to say

| | Comments (1) |

Image courtesy City of PasadenaLooming retirement from public office hasn't made Pasadena City Councilman Paul Little any more succinct.

During Monday's council meeting -- a relatively brief two-and-a-half hours -- the District 2 representative, who is not seeking another term this spring, maintained his reputation as being a man with something to say about, well, most everything.

Below are the findings of a thorough study of 30 minutes or so of the meeting. Being of the empirical persuasion, I'll disclose my methods: the video archive, a stopwatch and three cups of coffee.

First up was approval of the "consent calendar," known in more erudite circles as the really dull stuff.

Mayor Bill Bogaard -- a man rarely accused of brevity -- took 33 seconds to introduce and conclude the four-minute, 23-second discussion. For three minutes and 18 seconds of that, Paul voiced his concerns about a development at the former site of Shakers on Arroyo Parkway.

For those swayed by numbers: That's 72 percent of pure Paul.

Next on the agenda, 21-minutes spent on using up to $1 million in Gold Line surplus funds to install "train arrival information systems" in the city's light rail stations.

Steve Madison of District 6 came out swinging and, letting loose a staccato burst of inquiries, seemed poised to dominate the discourse. Ultimately, Steve's cumulative 90 seconds couldn't compete with four minutes from the tongue-fu master.

By the numbers, the cumulative 25 minutes, 23 seconds of the meeting broke down as follows:

0:40 - Victor Gordo
0:90 - Steve Madison
1:57 - Bill Bogaard
7:19 - Paul Little

Here is a chart.

The idea for this came during a Wednesday evening conversation with Paul, who owned up to having "gabby" tendancies.

More seriously, Paul said his pending retirement from the council hasn't diminished his energy or interest in the issues.

"I don't do lame duck. It's just not me," he said. "I'm certainly going to try to make sure the things I'm concerned about and want to see a resolution to are dealt with before May."

1 Comments

To be fair, you should have mentioned that I pulled the issue of the development on Cordova and Arroyo Parkway and explained to the council why I was questioning the design of the project. As for the Gold Line, I was the one who served on the Construction Authority and was responsible for bringing the money to Pasadena and understood the reason it was earmarked for sound mitigation. Perhaps it would have been more fair to do that in the context of the evening's main event -- the Desiderio proposal. Do you think more people read the paper or the blog?

Leave a comment

UNDER THE DOME

Dan Abenschein
Pasadena -- news, politics and gossip. Send tips, rumors, rants to Dan Abendschein dan.abendschein@sgvn.com.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Todd published on January 31, 2007 7:07 PM.

Forum footnote was the previous entry in this blog.

One sign to rule them all is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

The unrepentant verbalizer on Little still has a lot to say: To be fair, you should have mentioned that I pulled the issue of the d ...

Powered by Movable Type 4.25

Links

Our SGVN blogs

The Public Eye
SGVN Public Editor Larry Wilson muses on life, newspapering and the Velvet Underground.
Miguel Melendez Talks Prep Sports What else is there to say? Miguel is a cool guy who posts about local prep sports.
Crime Scene
Tribune crime guy Frank Girardot wants to know where the bodies are and what they're stuffed into.
Leftovers from City Hall
More city hall news and tidbits from around the Valley, brought to you by reporters Jennifer McLain and Tania Chatila.
Fred Robledo Talks Prep Sports
Tribune sports dude Fred Robledo's monster prep sports blog.

Advertisement

Headlines