Hey-oh!
In a world-wide exclusive interview, Nadya Suleman said she would talk about the In Touch article claiming she was a stripper in a San Diego strip club only to Radaronline. She said they will tape today for tomorrow.
But she did tell Octorazzi that "I've never even been in San Diego." "All I have to say is EEEWWWWWWWW."
"Now I've heard everything" Suleman added. "I'll tell details about that, I'll talk about that (with Radaronline)," she said. "Never been at Sea World," Suleman concluded.
Suleman did say that she is going to take the children "to look at dogs," as she pointed to Caleb, her two-year old twin.
When asked by telephone about cash donations received so far, Suleman's attorney Jeff Czech said that a trust fund is being set up for the children. "I gave this assignment to one of my associates," Czech said.
Czech also said that he is making sure that certain principal portions of child labor laws are being followed when the children are filmed "in case it's (the law) applicable later." Czech added that "we're not trying to get any money out of the children. The contract is with Nadya. Any filming with the babies is secondary," Czech said.
And, finally, Suleman tells Octorazzi that her contract with Radaronline will last for about one additional month. So keep watching out for THOSE videos over there and OCTORAZZI's videos over HERE!
Until next time,
LATES!
Why oh why is she raising those kids' hopes by taking them to look at dogs? I can guarantee that any dog they get is going to be a problem to that household.
And the fact that there isn't a trust for the children set up yet indicates that there probably WON'T be one. Czech delegated that to an associate? Uh huh. If a trust is actually created, you can bet it will be barely funded.
Czech added that "we're not trying to get any money out of the children"
Great line Czech. You mean radar would pay Nadya - an unknown, unemployed, achiever of nothing of interest and who has nothing at all to say - a gross amount of money every month for her singular "amazing" story ??
It is exploitation any time a child’s name or picture is used for public performance and media involvement especially when this is the primary means of support for the parents.
Nadya + Czech = 2 peas in a pod
LOL and San Diego thanks this white trash woman for never visiting
O.K. so here I go...I am a divorced mother of two with a nice divorce settlement and alimony. I am willing to pay all of Nadya's nannies for one day to take the day off from work. I just want to see how this crazy woman will handle life without all her help.
Octorazzi you can contact me anytime.
O.K. so here I go...I am a divorced mother of two with a nice divorce settlement and alimony. I am willing to pay all of Nadya's nannies for one day to take the day off from work. I just want to see how this crazy woman will handle life without all her help.
Octorazzi you can contact me anytime.
ADMIN NOTE: How can Octorazzi contact YOU if there is no registration?
'mom of two', who is really crazy then?
mom of two: to suggest leaving them alone with their mother for the day... well, that's just being plain cruel to the kids! (LOL)
Yes I am a mom of only two, thankfully they are honor high school and middle school students. And yes my offer still stands to pay One day's pay for Nadya's nannies to take the day off.
Such negativity...it's so catastrophizing...
Jeez, I try to use psychobabble, but I just can't do it right.
Hope this isn't a duplicate post but I can't find the one I tried to post earlier:
This is a serious thought that occurred to me in what seems to be the most ridiculous and troubling story of the decade: Can someone help me here? Somewhere it was reported that Octomom had been in an auto accident. When was this accident? Was it before she started having all the children? I am wondering if she may have had a brain injury at the time of the accident which went undiagnosed (it happens often) and could explain what seems to be much of her strange behavior maybe mixed with some other preexisting psychological problems that just got more exaggerated??? I am not making any excuses on her behalf but it could explain a heck of a lot that defies reason.
I'm always looking to make a huge comtribution to something every year. I sent a cheque to Nadya's lawyer which should pay for a dog for the kids, and vet and dog food for a full year. The kids don't have a father, and it's the least I can do for them to fill that void. Dogs are wonderful companions for children.
What's your point? You are the Queen of ugliness when it comes to referring to Nadya. You cut down, name call this woman over and over many times a day. It is taking a toll on you Ms. Peanut whether you realize it or not. All that negativity that comes out of your mouth about Nadya becomes who you are, your very being. Take a step back and read your posts. Have a loved one read them. Let them give you an honest opinion... someone with love with your best interest at heart. Because Dear Peanut, ugliness does not become anyone, especially you, who in reality seems really sweet and unfortunately drawn into that group to belong.
Sir, if you are serious, what do you have against dogs. Why would you want to put a small animal in that crowded situations with 6 plus kids to beat up on it. Have you ever watched toddlers with animals?
If you actually have that money to spare, could you not find any homeless, needy children in your community??
A good intention no doubt (and as generous as you have been) it may not be in the best interest of either the children or the future potential pet.
The demands of her family are so great that there is no way Nadya can properly care for a dog at this point. Her children are also not old enough to fill this role.
1- a dog, like a child requires a single primary caretaker (for the dog an alpha or master.)
2- a nanny cannot be the caretaker because the same nanny is not present all the time.
3- training can take 2 hours a day.
4- an untrained dog with no master is a very real potential danger. Small dogs can also bite hard and become overly aggressive and destructive.
I think Nadya may see a dog as something of a toy to occupy the children. Dogs are certainly not that. They are also not houseplants - just water and feed twice a day.
They are not supposed to fulfill the emotional voids of their owners any more than children are supposed to fulfill their parent's needs. This is cruel to an animal because often its own emotional and psychological needs go unmet. The results can be disastrous - just go to the SPCA where thousands of dogs once called cute/loving family members are discarded as unmanageable, aggressive and unwanted simply because their owners failed to properly train them. Who pays the price? The dog as well as any victim of the dog.
Dog ownership should never be a whimsical, impulsive venture. It is a long term commitment to another dependent living being that should be carefully thought out - kinda like having children.
I wouldn't take ANY post that claims to be making donations, especially large ones to Toxomom, seriously.
And Jake has been busy making really gross posts over on the other site, so let me remind you that you have no way of knowing what the level of posted sanity--Toxomom is not the only mental case out there or if you are reading the daily output of paid pro-Nuttyas trying to counteract the real world and giving Toxomom some sad little attempt at positive spin.
Especially when they can all cluster under anonymous. Octorazzi should start putting numbers on anonymous.
It's nice that people like Robin try to give her the benefit of the doubt and hope that Toxomom won't fail. But its' obvious she already has.The babies are three months old. That means she's got another 17 years and nine months of financial responsibility and she's blown it.
Right now it's just one more reason that she has every day.
Dozens and dozens. Lie after lie faster than they can be told. Money thrown away on every crappe thing but the future for the kids it meant to provide. Acted-out insanity, tackiness and tattoos and unanswered questions about the family.
It's all very limited, a whirlpool of bad daily swirling to worse and definitively sordid.
If there were any hope for these kids it would have manifested itself in some small way by now. All you see are the endless reasons this doesn't stand a chance to work.
That's not opinion. What else is there that would make you think this is a capable mother, not a mental case, in a functioning household, and not a camera rigged sideshow. It's a sick farce.
The only hope for those kids is being adopted by parents who place the responsibility of being a parent over the determination to be a celebrity.
-gala1
Jake, a sucker is born everyday. You actually sent a cheque to Crazy Mom. Hey guess what ,my kid needs a new bike (lol)
Octorazzi; Thank you for that beautiful of Nadya with the twins. BTW, the reason we post as anoymous is because to add a name to our posts gives certain people the impetus and focus for their attacks.
I completely agree. Remaining anonymous does neutralize the attacks which seem so important to some.
I just watched the new RO video where Nadya is denying the IN Touch story. I believe her and I am glad they have finally decided to actually pursue a lawsuit against one of her worst defamers. It is just unreal what people have been able to get away with saying about her, name calling and nasty comments constantly like she is the worst criminal ever seen in this country. Go for it Nadya and Mr Czech!
I am glad to hear that Nadya's attorney is looking out for the childrens' interests in making sure no labor laws have been broken. I love seeing the pictures and they are a viable means of providing income for their support at least for now.
divorced mother of two; Obviously your divorce settlement was too big! It was meant to benefit your children - not sabotage Nadya's!
Gala1 does calling anybody who doesn't trash Nadya a "paid poster" makes you feel better about all the bashing of Nadya you indulge in?
Great photos octo...love the octocrossing sign. You should give Nadya some of the shots you have taken of the kids and her. I am sure she would love to have them for her new house. Love that she is going back at InTouch......go Nadya.
Watching the video causes conflicting feelings. On the one side it seems like she is lying about something, or leaving key details out. On the other side I wonder why people are so bent on hurting this mother who clearly has way more to deal with than she can handle.
Let's say she was a stripper, or there is some grain of truth in this article. What good does digging it up do, including the financial and time costs of legal actions to clear her name. That family needs every single penny they can get - for basic life needs.
I agree with the previous poster who commented on the good of the photos of the babies. Hopefully that source can create some income to help this family help themselves and keep them off welfare, if possible.
I also agree with another poster who commented that the things she may be spending on herself are a very small percentage of her family costs and is it worth it to take everything away from this woman for the purpose of wanting her to suffer?
I would guess Jeff is very frustrated, trying to represent such a moving target whose definition of the truth is... well... movable.
The whole situation just feels so discouraging. In the current pictures, it is apparent that she is wearing down and feeling and looking tired. Yes, I do think she has created a mess and in some ways, is perpetuating it and making it worse. I also feel there is a sense of urgency for management to take over before there is a tragedy in that family.
I don't believe that Nadya has received enough donations to be more than a drop in the bucket as far as supporting those kids is concerned. That's why she has to use whatever other "little opportunity" she can come up with. I supported her with a couple of small donations but I fully support her in her effort to find a means to keep her family together amidst all this turmoil and criticism
Now that's a RO video I would watch, Octoscam could actually exploit her lack of parenting skills instead of exploiting her "little opportunities"...I'll throw in a stop at Mickey D for some nutritious fare for the mob!
Whoa! Czech's minions are out in force today! So many posts! Keep it up, jackasses. You're not fooling anyone.
Quite sure the attorney or staff are NOT here - perhaps only one fool?
Check out octorazzi's definition and rules on slander, please.
Oh what a sweet photograph! I know there are so many moments like this throughout the day that we never see.
Keep treading on Nadya. Stay strong for yourself and your little ones.
"they (photos of babies) are a viable means of providing income for their support"--
What a sad day when children have to earn their keep as well as that of their parents. How messed up is that?? I guess the eight will have to earn their 6 siblings keep too for the next eighteen years. Beautiful job Nadya, Natalie, whatever...how you've sucked away all the beauty.
Gala1 does calling anybody who doesn't trash Nadya a "paid poster" makes you feel better about all the bashing of Nadya you indulge in?
Why would i care anything about toxomom at all?
My only interest in this is the kids.
Does fronting for a conniving psycho make you feel better for the misery 14 kids will go through for the next 18 years?
-gala1