WhittierDailyNews.com | MyCapture
  • Live Traffic:
  • 60W
  • 5N
  • 605N
  • 605S
  • 57N
  • 57S
  • 105W
  •   This Site
  •  
  •  Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
  • Mobile |
  • Mobile Edition |
  • Subscriber Services |
  • RSS
Home
News
California
Crime
Earth Beat
Education
Elections
Health Beat
Sports
Buy Tickets
Preps
Youth Sports
Area Colleges
USC
UCLA
Lakers
Clippers
Dodgers
Angels
Kings
Ducks
Soccer
Motorsports
Live Odds
Scores/Stats
Business
Technology
Financial Markets
Opinions
Editorial
Letters
Columnists
Blogs
Write a Letter
LA.COM
Buy Tickets
Celebs & Gossip
Movies
TV
Music
Arts
Dining
Nightlife
Shopping & Beauty
Weekend
Comics
Games
Lottery
Horoscopes
Today
Taste
Getting Out
At Home
Customer Care
Contact Us
RSS
Site Map
Subscriber Services
Search Archives
Place An Ad
Mobile
NIE
Business Directory
Obituaries
Homes
Search Homes
Search MLS
Rentals
Foreclosures
Agents
SoCalRentSite.com
Place an Ad
This Week's Ads
Autos
Search Autos
Place an Ad
This Week's Ads
Jobs
Find a Job
Post a Job
This Week's Ads
Marketplace
Business & Services Directory
Search Classifieds
Place an Ad
Smart Shopper Coupons

OCTOMOM CARRIES WEIGHTS; GRANDMA ANGELA MAKES BROWNIE MIX

By Raul Roa on April 30, 2009 7:09 PM | 60 Comments
Hey-oh!

Got this WORLD WIDE EXCLUSIVE for YOU!

Suleman took one of the twins over to Grandma's to pick up the older children this afternoon.  AND grandma brought out some HOME MADE BROWNIE MIX, ready for the oven just before the kids got in the van.

Suleman FOUND her old weights and quickly put them in her van for later use. Even though Suleman insisted "I can't talk to you" Suleman did tell OCTORAZZI that she is preparing all the octuplets clothes that do not fit them already and is going to donate them.

Finally, Grandma said goodbye to her little visitors.  For all YOU wondering where GRANDMA lives, well, a, the Whittier home where she's been most likely staying all along.

Here are some pics for YOU.

webfamilytime.jpg

Until Next Time,

LATES!

Tags:

  • octomom nadya suleman angela octograndma brownie mix hand weights

60 Comments

TXcyclist | April 30, 2009 8:14 PM | Reply

Do you think Nadya knows how to turn on the oven? Hope she hides those weights, would hate for one of the older kids to find them and "play" inappropriately.

Octorazzi - so what's the deal on Octogranny's house, still in foreclosure; did she pay past due arrears with the money from the the RO video; has the house been repaired from damage caused by Nadya's kids; was Aiden there or just Elijah/Amerah/JJ...

I bet it was nice for those kids to spend the day with Octogranny and have the focus on them for a change. Bet they didn't want to go home...

Anonymous | April 30, 2009 8:23 PM | Reply

Ahhhh.. nice family interaction photos!

Anonymous | April 30, 2009 8:26 PM | Reply

I noticed that Grandma is still living in her home in Whittier, so I did a little research. Don’t worry, Grandma is not going to lose her house. She also took advantage of the little opportunities (Radar interviews - 2/9 & 2/24) and from what was said, earned $40,000 for herself. This was more than enough to pay the mortgage payments due on the house.

Documents dated Feb. 5 say Angela Suleman has 90 days to work out a new agreement with her mortgage company. After 90 days, Suleman must pay the balance of her mortgage, $453,750 initially in 2006, to keep her home from sale in an auction.

She has until 05/05/09. I’m sure she will make the deadline.

Anonymous | April 30, 2009 8:45 PM | Reply

Good for her. I'm glad she saved her home.

susan | April 30, 2009 9:06 PM | Reply

where is ed living?

Anonymous | April 30, 2009 11:34 PM | Reply

You people are so gullible. Has she saved her home? Just because she got RO money doesn't mean she paid her mortgage. No doubt Nadya had her in debt in many places other than the house. I wish Angela well and if she wants to keep the home, I hope she's able to. However, if I were her I'd let the house go and move into a studio apartment. That way Nadya would know she's on her own.

Before you start "high fiving" each other why don't you get the facts.

mia | May 1, 2009 12:17 AM | Reply

Actually, I read on another site that payments were brought up to date...so no foreclosure. From what I read, I thought the house was going up for auction May5 and if that's true, wouldn't she have had to vacate by now???

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 12:26 AM | Reply

In response to Anonymous 11:34 PM
Oh like you and your ***** even know what facts are.

ADMIN NOTE: WARNING, WARMING... no personal attacks or . DELETION< DELETION.. DEL.................

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 12:32 AM | Reply

1. This is a personal attack

2. It's even sillier that it comes from you.

rotflmao at the thought of you calling me a flunkie.

bookert | May 1, 2009 5:13 AM | Reply

Just read octomom's response to sons black eye and bite marks. She said I think it happened at school. What does she mean she thinks, she doesn't know how her son got a black eye and bite marks. Come on, how can you not know by 2 days later? In that amount of time she should know how it happened. This is so dissapointing. Did I miss anything about how it happened?

mississippimud | May 1, 2009 5:59 AM | Reply

Nadya believes the "black eye" happened at school and her 2 year old(Caleb) bit him. Although, she doesn't know how the black eye happened at school. Yeah, one would think she would ask the teacher about it?! It's great that octogranny gets to have the children at her home!

Not a fan of octomom in Alabama | May 1, 2009 6:19 AM | Reply

I imagine that Angela took the older children home with her after she confronted RUDE Nadya about the article in the newspaper concerning Aiden and how the lawyer responded. I am sure she was very embarrassed that it showed up in her hometown newspaper. She also wanted to know how it happened and Nadya could not tell her. Because she does not know! What a great mother!

Actually, Nadya did not have the time nor inclination to talk to her mother! After all, she was FILMING! LOL

Radar Online is not her friend. Notice the pan around of the camera to show the mess of toys?

Also in the RO video of the CPS incident, she says the teacher sent home a note and she did not read it and respond. So the teacher was mandated to call CPS.

NOW she is saying ... that SHE sent a note to the teacher.

Just another example of how she twists the truth all the time.

tavsmha replied to comment from bookert | May 1, 2009 6:25 AM | Reply

If he got the black eye at school why would the teacher report her? My child has been hurt at school and they called me at home to let me know what happened and I had to go in and sign a paper for her file. Now she has changed the story to it was over just the bite mark. I don't think she even knows what happened, that would take time away from her and the cameras to actually be a MOM and pay attention to her children. We can only pray for all 14 children that she gets some mental help and parenting classes, or the state steps in and takes the children away. I went back and checked RO and in every article and video the story changes. She is crazy and needs some serious help.

Anonymous replied to comment from bookert | May 1, 2009 6:31 AM | Reply

Obviously the child can't tell how he got the black eye which is not very severe. She says he is prone to throwing himself to the floor and does this both at home or and at school. This could have resulted in him hitting it on something. As for the bite marks, if you read or listen closer you find that the two year old boy twin has a habit of biting and Octorazzi even showed us a picture of the child biting Nadya on the back. She assumes that is how he got the bite marks. The attorney sure didn't do a good job of fielding that one. CPS and the police were evidently satisfied and no further investigation is planned. If she wasn't so high profile it wouldn't have been reported and followed up in quite the manner it was. Most of us have had to train a child not to bite and it takes time and perseverence.

Anonymous replied to comment from Not a fan of octomom in Alabama | May 1, 2009 6:34 AM | Reply

Actually she originally said she didn't find the note right away to respond to it and when she did find it and responded they had already made the report. I wonder why they didn't just pick up the phone and call her about it?

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 6:40 AM | Reply

Why didn't Angela wait to confront her daughter until RO was gone. She obviously knew she was being filmed. As a mother and grandmother I certainly wouldn't raise such a sensitive issue in front of those cameras. Nadya did intially ask her to wait but Angela wasn't about to wait. There are definitely two sides to that relationship and Angela aint no Angela in the way she keeps trashing her daughter for the public!

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 6:47 AM | Reply

She says no further investigation is planned. I don't believe a word that comes out of her mouth.

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 7:11 AM | Reply

It bothers me that Nadya wouldn't even address her mother when Angela was trying to talk to her about the CPS incident. Nadya was too busy talking to the Radar guy. I, for one, don't believe her when she says the CPS worker told her the investigation is over....

mississippimudpie | May 1, 2009 8:08 AM | Reply

One could only hope that this matter is taken care of, but who knows, you can not believe one word coming from Octomom's mouth! Yes, it takes a while to train a child, especially when you don't have the time to do it and you have lots of people in your home that shouldn't be there-meaning RO!

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 8:22 AM | Reply

I don't think Angela was aware that RO was taping the entire time and was genuinely concerned of the CPS visit and media implications.

I'm starting to think one of the best ways to help this situation may very well be to get Super Nanny in there, at least once per year, and let it be taped so that the family can get some money to keep them off welfare, and in the process maybe get some structure and training into that household. I think involving Angela as a key support person and a steady staff of nannies would be great to partner with Nadya, even on the show.

Next best to Super Nanny and likely more realistic - consistent CPS oversight. Unannounced, periodic visits could help keep Nadya in line.

I also think she is getting close to revealing OctoDad, but I am concerned that she expresses that "it's not about me, it's not about him, it is for the kids, to know their other side". I don't think that is fair to a person that other than trying to help a friend, was signing up for no other life obligation. That would be like insisting that a blood or bone marrow donor is responsible for having a relationship with the donee.

I hate to confess I am impressed with how well she is holding up under the circumstances. I do believe this woman genuinely loves her children and all things considered has a remarkably positive attitude and approach. (Sure, it could be that she is heavy in denial or delusion, but she has not broken down yet.)

I wish the best for this family. Nadya sure is not conventional or popular, but I do think her and her parents would do anything to make sure those kids all stay in her custody.

I wish for her children that for their sake, the hatred for their mother disolves and perhaps some of these companies can reach out to offer goods and services directly for and to the children.

For Nadya I wish a good life coach and fiscal custodian - for the family's sake.

This is just my opinion. I am neither a Nadya fan or a Nadya hater, just an observer who hopes this woman does NOT fail, for her children's sake.

Anonymous replied to comment from bookert | May 1, 2009 8:30 AM | Reply

"Just read octomom's response to sons black eye and bite marks. She said I think it happened at school. What does she mean she thinks, she doesn't know how her son got a black eye and bite marks. Come on, how can you not know by 2 days later? In that amount of time she should know how it happened. This is so dissapointing. Did I miss anything about how it happened?"

She said it happened at school after she said it happened at home during a "fit."

And now she claims that, not only did the social services investigator compliment her on what a fabulously organized household she runs, now she's claiming that they told her that the complaint was a "false allegation" and that she's "doing a great job."

I can't wait to hear what the next version of this mess is.

NCGramma replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 9:25 AM | Reply

Getting Super Nanny will not be of any help to Octomom until she stops babbling and listens to advice. She is totally oblivious to any constructive criticism and is so enjoying being in the spotlight that she cuts her own mother off and will not listen to her. I would like to see her mother slap her right on the mouth and flatten those lips.

Anonymous replied to comment from NCGramma | May 1, 2009 9:38 AM | Reply

I've seen Super Nanny put people in their place. I have the most faith in some kind of shock therapy like Super Nanny or Dr. Phil on a rampage. :)

The smack from the mother - now that would be a reality show many would tune into. :)

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 9:45 AM | Reply

Dr. Phil won't touch her again- she's toxic. And she would try to "one up" super nanny. After all, she's got a degree in child development, remember? LOL.

NCGramma | May 1, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply

Can we really believe that she has a degree in child development, or any degree for that matter. I would have to see proof before I believe anything she says.

TXcyclist replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 10:23 AM | Reply

Now if she could only put it to use! Somehow NS has had yet another disconnect, classroom theory vs. practical application...LOLx2

anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 10:30 AM | Reply

I think on the contrary, it was totally obnoxious of her mother to barge into her home the way she did. Really disrespectful. Angela seemed more concerned about "public image" and the way the attorney responded to the allegations. Super Nanny would be good. Win, win for Nadya and the kids. Learn some new skills and make money off of it.

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 10:35 AM | Reply

I'm more convinced than ever that most of her annoying mannerisms and story inconsistencies are due to her Attention Deficit Disorder with maybe a little Tourettes thrown in.

I used to think she knit her eyebrows when asked a question to show her disapproval of the question or imply the ridiculousness of the question. Now I'm more inclined to believe its a physical manifestation of her attempt at concentration or an attempt at trying very hard to focus.

Notice how she blinks her eyes (tics as associated with Tourettes) and nods her head but seems never to have fully heard or understood the question. When asked for clarification she becomes frustrated and thats when her speech and gestures become exagerated.

I think she is showing signs of strain, those being the ones mentioned. The tics seem worse at times when she's being interviewed and trying to multitask.

She completely dismisses her mother because mom is a "familiar" she doesn't need to waste her focus on her.

I don't think she remembers her story from one day to the next so maybe she's not intentionally lying, maybe she was just not fully "plugged in" when she was saying it so she doesn't remeber it. Beyond that, it seems that if she analyzes a situation afterwards and feels that there might be a version that would make her look better she changes the story without recognizing that it might be a problem for others who do remember.

Remember how Munoz said that explaining something to Nadya was very difficult. He said something that should take 20 minutes to hear and understand would take hours of discussion with her.

On top of these neurological problems there are probably some personality disorders involved too but this is all conjecture. To say the least, she's a very complicated mix of a whole host of problems. Anyway, just my opinion.

I really don't think anyone could be that obnoxious on purpose. I find watching her almost painful.

anonymous | May 1, 2009 10:42 AM | Reply

I have to say, I would be rattled with the combination of noise, kids running around and being interrogated in front of a camera as she is with RO. If it wasn't for the money, I would have them out the door in a hurry.

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 11:09 AM | Reply

She speaks/answers in circles. Never gives a drect answer to a question. I think it's her way of getting out of a situation. I also think that she was aware of the black eye and biting issue but ignored it as being ok, since it's the norm for her son to bite. Her concern should with the interactions between the older kids and the babies. I undertand that nannies are their to help raise them, but it only takes a second for an incident to happen, especially when they reach the age that they are no longer in their cribs...you know, the terrible 2's. She has biter and obviously she's done nothing to correct that behaviour. Sad, sad, sad.

Anonymous | May 1, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply

Two observations:

1. Angelia, while unaware of the RO filming going on , suggested to Nadya that she should have stated that the black eye incident occurred at school, regardless of what the truth was. She was not concerned at all about the incident itself, and Aiden's wellbeing, but rather about damage control to NS parenting skills image.

2. Nadya knew about the bitting incident one or two days before she was paid a visit by child services. I think the RO video where she discusses her past bitting habits, and specifically mentions that a few of her kids bite as well, was a preemption attempt to explain away the biting accident that she knew has occurred, and may pop up in the media. Why else would she suddenly recall this mundane fact that was not at all related to the questions presented to her?

Comment 5/1 replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 12:28 PM | Reply

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who noticed the tics becoming more pronounced. Also, habit of bringing her left hand to her cheek when she is flustered.

Who is the "manager" since there is no one in parent role? Bites and black eye would have been noticed at bath time at least if any organization at all in the home. She could have inititated the contact with the school with her excuses/explanations if someone had been observant.

They are being raised like animals with no limits. There is so much anger and frustration exhibited by the older ones. Who is going to help channel that? I worry that as the babies become more accessible to the older ones there will be more "accidents". Repeating the word "gentle" and then ignoring everything is not working.

I think the many tantrums we have observed are symptomatic of some unmet needs or undiagnosed behavioral or psychological problems. I consider biting and hitting to be tantrums in this context. They bite and hit Nadya in addition to the screaming.

I wonder why there is no music in the house. A little Mozart wouldn't hurt. The sound level from the older children is hard to tolerate even on the snippets of video. She could use the Baby Einstein series for a start. Using TV or videos in these circumstances might not be a bad thing. Most children like Dora! It could be a start to getting them on a schedule.

Is there a reason that they don't ever seem to be seated at a table to eat? The babies are tended by the various women and I am sure that the needs that can be LOGGED ON A CHART are being met. However, setting out food on the counter or trying to feed a toddler on a bed doesn't make sense. Can you imagine what high chairs and eight toddlers will be like in that cramped space?

I hope that people who feel the compulsion to donate will find others in need who will appreciate the kindness. If you review the videos, she is very dismissive of the various donations. I don't see any appreciation. She wants opportunities for endorsements and corporate contributions not individual donations.

Let's be grateful for the grandmother. She and the grandfather are the only bits of normalcy in those children's lives.

I believe Nadya will announce another pregnancy by August of 2010. What if she meets someone and wants to have HIS babies? Please note that I am not suggesting that she will marry or be in a relationship.

I have not commented before and I didn't even mention puppies or pigs or her taste [or lack of] in clothes. Also, since she isn't nursing, isn't she more than a little top heavy? Industrial strength support? Maybe I missed the news on all the augmentations! Didn't she say that her normal weight is less than 120? That is the one thing she has accomplished --- weight loss.

Donna | May 1, 2009 1:38 PM | Reply

Am I the only one who is bothered by the seeming lack of concern over Aiden's injuries? She keeps changing stories and doesn't seem to know how he got a black eye.

The video of the argument with her mom is just so typical. She never lets her mom finish a sentence. Instead of listening and responding to her mom's concerns, Nadya keeps turning to the camera man to talk to him.

The whole "disassociate" with her parents thing is bull. She doesn't want them around because they tell her 'no'. She doesn't like that word. I hope for the sake of the children, Angela and Ed stay in their lives. They seem to me to be the only stablizing influence the children have.

66rock replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply

ah, maybe, just maybe, Angela is part of the the show.

Seems they use Grama whenever they Need interest back up or to counter bad press. She is the only one that has generated any sympathy from the public in that family and they play on it when they have to.

Only when they have to use her though because her ungrateful, spoiled daughter doesn't care for her much. Seems grama gets compensated too though. Scam family.

66rock replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 2:29 PM | Reply

I believe Gram Angela was very aware of the camera. That is what she was paid to be there for otherwise it would have been a private discussion just like any family. This family has it's eye on the prize and do whatever little interaction that radaronline suggests.

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 2:32 PM | Reply

How many of us would respond without getting fighting mad to the kind of questions Nadya is asked. Most of them are really none of our business. People keep saying that it is our business because we are supporting her but we don't get to question every other mother on welfare or person on disability about how they spend their money, etc. I really have to admire her for her ability to keep her cool. It was good to see her show some spunk today as she dared us to find out who the daddy is!

susan replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 3:43 PM | Reply

ro brought up the fact to nadya that angela brings up a lot of topics in front of them and other people as though she wants witnesses to the confrontations. it is on one of the videos.
in many ways angela started the problems since she spoke to the media first. the hospital had said that "the mother wants privacy and they would not be disclosing her identity". i would not want my daughter to go down this route that nadya has taken. by this i mean kids without a father. you need someone to shoulder some of the work and two old people aren't up to the long haul. still i would help my daughter anyway i could and if i bitched about it, it would only be to a close confident that i had known for a long time. what did she hope to gain from speaking to the media so derogatorily about her daughter, that everyone would agree with her that her daughter is irresponsible and that she is a martyr? well she achieved her objective. did angela get paid for that first interview? or just the two bitch sessions with nadya? nadya has said that her mother criticised everything she has ever done. my mother also criticised me but then she reached a stage where she had to accept that the person i am is the best she has achieved as a parent. warts and all i am her daughter. angela doesn't seem to have reached that level of acceptance with nadya.

Anonymous replied to comment from susan | May 1, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply

But angela didn't release nadya's identity- Kaiser did, with nadya's permission.

Anonymous replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 4:05 PM | Reply

Are you sure Kaiser released it, or did they release it after Angela gave her first interview to the AP. She probably didn't get paid for that so why did she even do it. That was two days after the birth and the first the press seemed to have any real information about Nadya

GAgal replied to comment from Anonymous | May 1, 2009 8:03 PM | Reply

"I don't think she remembers her story from one day to the next so maybe she's not intentionally lying, maybe she was just not fully "plugged in" when she was saying it so she doesn't remeber it. Beyond that, it seems that if she analyzes a situation afterwards and feels that there might be a version that would make her look better she changes the story without recognizing that it might be a problem for others who do remember."

Yeah, yeah...THAT"S the ticket! Yeah....

kp | May 2, 2009 12:55 AM | Reply

I think she is on Crystal METH. She rambles, never stops moving, and twitches all over the place.
When she speaks, she zones out and she rapidly repeats herself over and over again. For example when she did the 911 call because SHE (not the nanny or grandma) lost son JJ; when she argues with Angela on the RO video interviews; when she is dressing one of the babies and says, I promise I promise I promise...; when she is denying stripping and says, I never ever ever ever ever ever ever. How could her kid's not develop impulsive behaviours- they see and hear her flying all over the place. Perhaps, that would explain the behaviour problems in the older kids- they are in a VERY unstable & unsupervised environment with absolutely no discipline.
Repeating "gentle, gentle" over and over is not structure or discipline.
Any drug addict or a mentally deficient parent can cause a child to develop ADHD and learning disabilities. Or, they can raise unruly brats. I believe what she says about causing poor little Aiden's autism, except that she was using drugs instead of the large amounts of coffee as she has stated.

susan replied to comment from kp | May 2, 2009 5:10 AM | Reply

but she doesn't have sores she picks at!

susan replied to comment from kp | May 2, 2009 6:52 AM | Reply

please explain how a mentally deficient parent or drug addict can cause a child to develop adhd and learning disabilities.

NCGramma | May 2, 2009 7:17 AM | Reply

Have we seen any video of Nadya feeding her children at the table? Why does a mother flit about the room with a plate of food in her hand and occasionally stop by the bed to feed the children. In fact I did not see them eat anything. She should have a regular mealtime with the older children seated at the table with her. I really think Nadya is ADHD or she is either on drugs or maybe both.

Donna replied to comment from susan | May 2, 2009 7:33 AM | Reply

Susan- I'm not saying that NS has drug issues- just answering your question.

A parent with drug/alcohol issues during pregnancy has changes in hormones and chemicals that affect brain development.

katy | May 2, 2009 8:32 AM | Reply

i just watched the RO video of Nadya discussing the CPS visit in her bedroom.

This is what I see: The room has 3 cribs and a large bed. Nadya is holding a plate of food in one hand, utensils in the other. Her back is to Aiden,3 and Caleb,2 while her attention is to the camera and an interviewer who is asking questions about a child neglect/abuse report that for any mother would be a very big deal.

WTF#1: It appears her task is feeding the children. Not clear whether she just follows them around and shovels it in or if the usual practice is to feed them on the bed.

WTF#2: If her task is to feed the children, I'm confused why she [and RO] is choosing this time for a sensitive interview. She seems NOT distracted from the task of feeding her children by RO, but IS DISTRACTED BY HER CHILDREN IN DOING THIS INTERVIEW!

WTF#3: After Caleb whacks Aiden while his Moms attention is on the camera, Caleb advances on the camera [now in HIS face] and whacks it. Mom apologizes TO THE CAMERA[!][that is in the two year old's face during his "dinner" in his bedroom with a camera crew for a national audience] and and declares that this baby is aggressive!

C'mom RO!!! Nadya's deficits are grossly apparent, and as the only adults in the room you should have turned off the cameras, apologized to the children for contributing to the chaos and left.

Nadya: Watch the video! People with attentional issues can learn to self monitor.

Also, consider purchasing a dinner table instead of a air hockey table. The 7 of you should sit down together at least once a day, even just for milk and cookies, as an act of commitment to creating a cohesive family.

Simonae@telus,net | May 2, 2009 11:34 AM | Reply

Hi NsGramma

You said:

NCGramma | May 1, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply
Can we really believe that she has a degree in child development, or any degree for that matter. I would have to see proof before I believe anything she says.

MOI:

My husband and I saw a program on T.V. recently showing how you can BUY degrees on line, not hard to do at all..JUST some CASH and or credit card and VOILA a degree in psychology, or A degree in Business. ETC.

So what your saying I certainly agree with. I want to see PROOF also and from the COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY She claims she got it from..I wouldn't trust her further than I can spit in a high wind.

I have noticed her obvious LACK of parenting skills, Especially the fact that they (the children) don't listen to her AT ALL. I also noticed the children do NOT respond to her phony attempts at affection. As a matter of fact the children seem 'UNCOMFORTABLE' with her attention, as though they aren't used to it. I never EVER see them hugging her or planting a kiss on her. My daughter used to be glued to me. That's what makes me question the LACK of affection FROM them TO her.

Simonae | May 2, 2009 12:43 PM | Reply

I can't believe that 'MAKING A BROWNIE'is even news worthy. Which one of us grammas don't bake for their grandchildren 100 times a month? Don't we all wish we had a penny for EACH and every bit of baking we've done/do? BIG DEAL!

Author Profile Page Wendy replied to comment from NCGramma | May 2, 2009 1:33 PM | Reply

I think there may have been one time she was feeding one child some macaroni & cheese at a table way back at the old house. You would think she would have set down the rule no food outside of the kitchen or away from the dinner table (if she does have one, I don't remember seeing one at the new house.) It's much easier to clean up after once a child is done and will help to avoid dropped food from becoming choking hazards one the octs can crawl/walk. You also would think she would have learned how trashed a house can appear/be when food is smeared all over, like at the last house.

I've always been raised to believe it's important to have at least that one meal together as a family per day, while growing up, while raising my own family, & now when the g-kids are over. I think her family would really benefit from it.

Donna | May 2, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply

Honestly, I can't imagine there would be enough room in that house for a kitchen table. 15 people (plus nannies, plus R.O. people) in a 2800 sq. ft house is one tight fit!

It would be nice to sit down and eat though. That little bit of structure is immensely helpful to kids.

Author Profile Page jake replied to comment from Wendy | May 2, 2009 2:01 PM | Reply

With so many kids involved in after school activies and both parents working, how many families sit down to a meal together besides Thanksgiving and Christmas? Not many anymore. Nadya is showing us the typical American family in this decade. Leave it to Beaver is history. Now it's the grandparents who provide the home cooking and the sit downs.

Author Profile Page jake replied to comment from Donna | May 2, 2009 2:03 PM | Reply

She needs a 4000 sq ft home.

katy | May 2, 2009 2:09 PM | Reply

The more i see of this family via Radar Online the more concerned I become. This families' needs and adjustments are too many and too complex to add an exploitative film crew to the mix.

Radar Online needs to leave. Only family and people involved in child care should be allowed in this HOME.

Nadya is too distracted around a camera. When there is a child and a camera, the camera always wins.

Anonymous replied to comment from jake | May 2, 2009 2:12 PM | Reply

We sit down to dinner together every night. And no one is asking her to sit down with everyone- just sit those kids at a darn table to eat, rather than let them run around the house or eat on the bed.

Author Profile Page jake replied to comment from Anonymous | May 2, 2009 2:24 PM | Reply

When we were kids, we were strapped to the dinner table and then strapped to the potty chair. If I didn't want to eat, my mother would squeeze my nose to get me to swallow. My father was a drunk and was drunk every night at the dinner table. One of us usually got a plate thrown at us. As an adult, dinner times weren't and isn't my favourite time of day. When I had my family, we had a family room. One of us parents worked shift work and the other was on call. We rarely ate together and the kids ate in the family room. The only time we all sat down for a meal was when we entertained or when we visited Granny. Soccer games were at 6:00 so we ate on the go on a regular basis. We weren't any different than the other families in our subdivision.

Author Profile Page jake | May 2, 2009 2:42 PM | Reply

When we started school we weren't allowed to eat until dad got home from work and after he had his three stiff drinks. We were so hungry, we wanted to eat the plaster off the walls. When us older kids were off to college, my younger sister got to eat before dad got home. She was allowed to eat hot dogs in front of the TV every day after school. My mother was too worn out by then to care. Yeah there was a lot of mental and physical abuse in our home growing up. I watch Nadya with her kids and read the complaints from the Nadya haters about how bad a parent she is. Man, I would have loved to be a kid growing up in her home.

Anonymous | May 2, 2009 2:45 PM | Reply

Both extremes are forms of child abuse Jake.

susan | May 2, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply

din't angela even say the kids ate in shifts cause there were too many to eat at the table?

Simonae | May 2, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply

Not EVERY home makes mealtime and UNPLEASANT experience.
Yeah here we wait till hubby comes home..That also is done in MOST homes, waiting to eat together. Father's work. That's why you had food on the table. And we mom's try to make the best possible meals for our families. If the kids didn't want to eat dinner that was also fine, the next meal would be breakfast. :) But we do sit together for EVERY meal.
It's not a good thing when you have kids running around the house eating, and dropping food and spilling drinks all over the house.. That creates a lot more work for the mother. And it's just NOT necessary to allow that. Kids NEED to sit down and eat a nutritional meal, they learn good table manners also. It's not even healthy for children to RUN around while eating. The kitchen table is a good place for staying in touch with each other. It's wrong to allow one or two of the children to eat in front of the T.V. and to eat before the father came home, very unfair to the ones who have to wait. There should be NO favoritism with the children in the family. It should always be well balanced.
Some mom's make a habit of cooking different foods at different times for fussy kids. That is a lot of work for nothing. I guess I should've said I know of ONE mother who does that..Then she wonders why she's in the kitchen hours on end.
How awful it must have been for you..
In Canada I don't know of any families (or know families) that don't sit together, that still a most important part of our day here, and it's fun to be together and share stories from our day. WE still enjoy mealtimes together..Thank God we do..

Author Profile Page jake replied to comment from Simonae | May 2, 2009 3:57 PM | Reply

Yeah but Nadya is a new age parent. My SIL and BIL have sit down meals with their kids but their kids aren't allowed dessert. The parents have dessert when they kids are in bed.

Leave a comment

Categories

Monthly Archives

  • May 2009 (21)
  • April 2009 (126)
  • March 2009 (102)

Pages

  • Subscribe to feed Subscribe to this blog's feed
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

Search

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Raul Roa published on April 30, 2009 7:09 PM.

SULEMAN SAYS OCTUPLETS ARE "HUGE"; AND ABOUT HER CHILDREN EDUCATION: "The majority of my money that I earn will go to private school but it's worth it" was the previous entry in this blog.

SULEMAN: TAE KWON DO FOR CHILDREN? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Advertisement

Photos

Powered by Movable Type